<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for domiknow.co.uk</title>
	<link>http://domiknow.co.uk</link>
	<description>An Occasional Blog of Notes/Domino Administration and Development Stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on SnTT: Confirm OTA Message Delivery to Blackberry Devices by David</title>
		<link>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/05/22/sntt-confirm-ota-message-delivery-to-blackberry-devices/#comment-129</link>
		<author>David</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 03:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/05/22/sntt-confirm-ota-message-delivery-to-blackberry-devices/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>This is a very cool SNTT tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very cool SNTT tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SnTT: Busytime, Mail-in Database Calendars and Upgrading from ND6.x by Paul Harrison</title>
		<link>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/03/06/sntt-busytime-mail-in-database-calendars-and-upgrading-from-nd6x/#comment-49</link>
		<author>Paul Harrison</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/03/06/sntt-busytime-mail-in-database-calendars-and-upgrading-from-nd6x/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>@Nathan - Thanks for clarifying any potential licensing issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nathan - Thanks for clarifying any potential licensing issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SnTT: Busytime, Mail-in Database Calendars and Upgrading from ND6.x by Nathan T. Freeman</title>
		<link>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/03/06/sntt-busytime-mail-in-database-calendars-and-upgrading-from-nd6x/#comment-48</link>
		<author>Nathan T. Freeman</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/03/06/sntt-busytime-mail-in-database-calendars-and-upgrading-from-nd6x/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>"I think, in this case you would have to pay for additional licences, wouldn’t you?"

Actually, I'm certain you wouldn't.  Accounts created solely for administrative and functionality purposes do not require a license.  This is very clearly stated in the licensing rules from IBM.  That's why you don't have to license development signature IDs, or LDAP logins, or special accounts for LEI, or anything that's not associated with a *person*.  You are required to buy licenses for human beings, be they employees, contractors, vendors, partners, suppliers or customers.  You are not required to buy licenses for computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think, in this case you would have to pay for additional licences, wouldn’t you?&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, I&#8217;m certain you wouldn&#8217;t.  Accounts created solely for administrative and functionality purposes do not require a license.  This is very clearly stated in the licensing rules from IBM.  That&#8217;s why you don&#8217;t have to license development signature IDs, or LDAP logins, or special accounts for LEI, or anything that&#8217;s not associated with a *person*.  You are required to buy licenses for human beings, be they employees, contractors, vendors, partners, suppliers or customers.  You are not required to buy licenses for computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SnTT: Busytime, Mail-in Database Calendars and Upgrading from ND6.x by Paul Harrison</title>
		<link>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/03/06/sntt-busytime-mail-in-database-calendars-and-upgrading-from-nd6x/#comment-47</link>
		<author>Paul Harrison</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/03/06/sntt-busytime-mail-in-database-calendars-and-upgrading-from-nd6x/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>@Thomas - yes you are absolutely correct. However this workaround will enable a post-upgrade transitory period, during which time, the information in these calendars can be migrated to the new RnRMgr facility. Once migrated, the associated Person Documents can then be removed.

@Fred - in the past, I've seen stand-alone calendar files (without any associated Person or Mail-in Database Documents) used for simple room booking management because of inherent issues with the old R&#038;R (pre-ND7) implementation. In addition, by making these stand-alone calendars Mail-in Databases, it is then possible to perform busytime look-ups again them and check for availability, thus providing very similar functionality to the old R&#038;R system.

The new RnRMgr functionally is significantly better, and I agree that it totally elevates the need for these stand-alone calendars, however it can become a time consuming and complex task, to not only migrate all of the calendar data across, but also to educate users about the changes. In my experience, this can only practically be performed after the upgrade (ie once the new RnRMgr is available), as a follow-on piece of work. I trust this now makes a little more sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Thomas - yes you are absolutely correct. However this workaround will enable a post-upgrade transitory period, during which time, the information in these calendars can be migrated to the new RnRMgr facility. Once migrated, the associated Person Documents can then be removed.</p>
<p>@Fred - in the past, I&#8217;ve seen stand-alone calendar files (without any associated Person or Mail-in Database Documents) used for simple room booking management because of inherent issues with the old R&#038;R (pre-ND7) implementation. In addition, by making these stand-alone calendars Mail-in Databases, it is then possible to perform busytime look-ups again them and check for availability, thus providing very similar functionality to the old R&#038;R system.</p>
<p>The new RnRMgr functionally is significantly better, and I agree that it totally elevates the need for these stand-alone calendars, however it can become a time consuming and complex task, to not only migrate all of the calendar data across, but also to educate users about the changes. In my experience, this can only practically be performed after the upgrade (ie once the new RnRMgr is available), as a follow-on piece of work. I trust this now makes a little more sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SnTT: Busytime, Mail-in Database Calendars and Upgrading from ND6.x by Fred Janssen</title>
		<link>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/03/06/sntt-busytime-mail-in-database-calendars-and-upgrading-from-nd6x/#comment-46</link>
		<author>Fred Janssen</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/03/06/sntt-busytime-mail-in-database-calendars-and-upgrading-from-nd6x/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Maybe I am missing something, but:

Why collect busytime info for mail-in databases?
If it's for Rooms &#38; Resoruces, the new RnRMgr takes care of that (but you do need to upgrade design of the Resource databases to the new Design.

Fred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I am missing something, but:</p>
<p>Why collect busytime info for mail-in databases?<br />
If it&#8217;s for Rooms &amp; Resoruces, the new RnRMgr takes care of that (but you do need to upgrade design of the Resource databases to the new Design.</p>
<p>Fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SnTT: Busytime, Mail-in Database Calendars and Upgrading from ND6.x by Thomas Bahn</title>
		<link>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/03/06/sntt-busytime-mail-in-database-calendars-and-upgrading-from-nd6x/#comment-45</link>
		<author>Thomas Bahn</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/03/06/sntt-busytime-mail-in-database-calendars-and-upgrading-from-nd6x/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I think, in this case you would have to pay for additional licences, wouldn't you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, in this case you would have to pay for additional licences, wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SnTT: PlanetLotus on your Notes 8.0.1 Sidebar, without using RSS by Paul Harrison</title>
		<link>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/01/24/sntt-planetlotus-on-your-notes-801-sidebar-without-using-rss/#comment-32</link>
		<author>Paul Harrison</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/01/24/sntt-planetlotus-on-your-notes-801-sidebar-without-using-rss/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Thanks for your suggestion, I'll try that next time . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks for your suggestion, I&#8217;ll try that next time . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SnTT: PlanetLotus on your Notes 8.0.1 Sidebar, without using RSS by Chris Miller</title>
		<link>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/01/24/sntt-planetlotus-on-your-notes-801-sidebar-without-using-rss/#comment-31</link>
		<author>Chris Miller</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domiknow.co.uk/2008/01/24/sntt-planetlotus-on-your-notes-801-sidebar-without-using-rss/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Just upload your screenshots to a site like photobucket or even Flickr and then use the img src tag..  works like a charm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just upload your screenshots to a site like photobucket or even Flickr and then use the img src tag..  works like a charm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SnTT: Preventing Sametime Users from Accessing Hidden Groups by Paul Harrison</title>
		<link>http://domiknow.co.uk/2007/11/22/sntt-preventing-sametime-users-from-accessing-hidden-groups/#comment-23</link>
		<author>Paul Harrison</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domiknow.co.uk/2007/11/22/sntt-preventing-sametime-users-from-accessing-hidden-groups/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Thomas, 

Thanks for your feedback and for your excellent suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas, </p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback and for your excellent suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SnTT: Preventing Sametime Users from Accessing Hidden Groups by Thomas Bahn</title>
		<link>http://domiknow.co.uk/2007/11/22/sntt-preventing-sametime-users-from-accessing-hidden-groups/#comment-22</link>
		<author>Thomas Bahn</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domiknow.co.uk/2007/11/22/sntt-preventing-sametime-users-from-accessing-hidden-groups/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Since the information about the allowed readers of the group document is stored in an item called $Readers, you could filter the replication on this field: SELECT !($Readers!="" &#38; Form ="Group") 

This would filter out ALL protected group documents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the information about the allowed readers of the group document is stored in an item called $Readers, you could filter the replication on this field: SELECT !($Readers!=&#8221;" &amp; Form =&#8221;Group&#8221;) </p>
<p>This would filter out ALL protected group documents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
